Cost-Effective Electricity to Meet Long-Term Demand
Site C would be cost-effective and would result in lower costs to ratepayers compared to alternatives.
Site C would be cost-effective and would result in lower costs to ratepayers compared to alternatives.
More than 99 per cent of Class 1 to 5 agricultural land in the Peace Agricultural Region would not be affected by Site C. Approximately 2.6 million hectares would remain available for agricultural production in the region, while approximately 3,800 hectares would be unavailable.
BC Hydro provided its initial response to the release of the Joint Review Panel Report on the proposed Site C Clean Energy Project.
Site C provides the best combination of financial, technical, environmental, and economic development attributes, compared to alternatives.
The construction and operation of Site C would generate economic benefits for British Columbians through job creation, economic development and increased revenues for all levels of government.
The demand for electricity in B.C. is forecast to increase by approximately 40 per cent in the next 20 years. Site C would help meet B.C.’s long-term electricity needs.
As part of the environmental review, BC Hydro has assessed the potential effects of Site C on wildlife, and has proposed comprehensive mitigation measures.